Radiation Oncology Synopsis

Ewing's Sarcoma in Adults

Natural History

In the past Ewing's sarcoma was associated with poor prognosis. Nearly 80% developed distant mets and died. Multi-agent chemotherapy with neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment has considerably improved the prognois. Current multi-modal treatment offers progression free survival in 60-75% of localized Ewing's sarcoma. In both Ewing's and osteosarcomas, cure is still achievable even in the setting of metastatic disease at presentation.

Patients with Ewing's sarcoma develop localized pain and edema, and unlike other bone neoplasms, constitutional symptoms are occasionally present. Abnormal labs include elevated LDH and leukocytosis.

The most important prognostic factors are:

Nearly 1/4 present with mets which is the most significant adverse prognostic factor in Ewing's and other bone sarcomas. Ewing's metastasizes to the lungs, bones and marrow most commonly. Femur, pelvic bones and bones of the chest wall are most frequently involved, but Ewing's may appear anywhere. When Ewing's arises in the long bones, it most commonly manifests in the diaphysis with periosteal reaction (oinion skinning).

A European Intergroup reported RFS5 of 22% with M1a/b at diagnosis and 55% with M0 disease.

The results of the Intergroup Ewings Sarcoma Study found that primary pelvic tumors had the lowers survival compared with distal lesions of the extremities. An analysis of 54 patients showwed that pelvic disease and time to local therapy in patients treated with chemotherapy are significant prognostic factors.

Lee determined the following adverse prognostic indicators (OS):

Staging AJCC 7th Ed.

Primary Tumor
T1 Tumor ≤ 8 cm
T2 Tumor > 8 cm
T3 Discontinuous tumor in the primary bone
N -Stage
N0 No nodes
N1 Node positive
M Stage
M0 No distant mets
M1a Lung mets only
M1b Other distant sites

Stage Grouping

Grade T1 T2 T3 N1 M1a M1b
G1 IA IB IB IVB IVA IVB
G2 IA IB IB IVB IVA IVB
G3 IIA IIB III IVB IVA IVB

Ewing's Sarcoma Diagnosis and Work Up

Ewing's Sarcoma is a malignant "small round blue cell" of the bone or soft tissue. It most commonly occurs in the pelvis, femur, humerus and ribs. A common genetic locus t(11:22) is responsible for a large percentage of Ewing's sarcomas and PNETs. Ewing's occurs most commonly in teens and more commonly in male teens. Ewings presents with an "onion skin appearance on radiographs. Ewings is classified as a bone tumor, but it can have characteristics of both mesodermal and ectodermal origins.

If Ewing's sarcoma is suspect, a complete staging workup should be completed prior to biopsy.

Differentiating Ewings from Osteosarcoma
Ewing's Sarcoma Osteosarcoma
Lytic, destructive lesion Sclerotic lesion
Diaphysis (shaft) Metaphysis
Onion Skin radiograph Sunburst pattern radiograph

Adult Ewing's Sarcoma Natural History

Ewing's Sarcoma has a genetic component involving t(11:22) transposition and t(7:22) transposition. Ewing's sarcoma differes from typical adult sarcomas as they are considered systemic disease at first presentation. There is no universally accepted staging for Ewings and it is generally staged as bone. Ewing's (and rhabdomyosarcomas) are generally much more chemosensitive in adults. (Osteosarcomas are generally more resistant in adults than peds),

Workup (NCCN)

Treatment

Adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for adults with Ewing's or rhabdomyosarcomas. The NCCN guidelines recommend as Category 1 evidence a minimum of 12 - 24 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by restagingwith chest imaging, and local imaging. If there is a response to chemotherapy (ie stable disease) then proceeding to WLE or pre-op radiation therapy followed by WLE followed by additional chemotherapy (± RT). Additional options include Definitive RT and chemotherapy or amputation in select cases followed by post-op chemotherapy and consideration of adjuvant RT depending on margin status.

Stable Disease

in the event that WLE is chosen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, then it should be treated with additional adjuvant chemotherapy if there are negative margins. However, if there are positive margins then adding local radiation either after chemotherapy or concurrent with chemotherapy is recommended by the 2011 NCCN guidelines as category I recommendations.

If pre-op RT is given then post-op chemotherapy ± RT after WLE should be considered.

Progressive Disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

If there is progressive disease after chemotherapy then RT and/or surgery to the primary site for local control or palliation in recommended. This is generally followed by chemotherapy or best supportive care.

Chemotherapy Regimens

First Line Primary/Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Chemotherapy
  • VAC/IE (vincristine/adriamycin/cyclophosphamide-alternating with ifosfamide/etoposide)
    • In pediatric (< 18 yo) patients recent evidence from COG supports compressed q2 week treatment v. q3 week treatments
  • VAI (vincristine, doxorubicin, ifosfamide)
  • VIDE (vincristine, ifosfamide, daoxorubicin and etoposide)
Metastatic Disease at Presentation
  • CVD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin)
  • VAC/IE (vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide in alternation with ifosfamide, etoposide
  • VAI (vincristine, doxorubicin and ifosfamide
  • VIDE (vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide)
Second Line therapy for relapsed/refractory disease
  • Cyclophosphamide and topotecan
  • Temozolomide and irnotecan
  • ifosfamide and etoposide
  • ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide
  • Docetaxel and gemcitabine

Vincristine may be added to any of the above regimens.

Studies

POG-CCG/INT 0091
  • Patients with non-metastatic Ewing's were randomized to chemotherpy: VACD alone or VACD alternating with etoposide and isfosfamide for 17 cycles total.
  • EFS5 69% (VACD/IE) v. 54% (VACD alone)
  • A survival benefit was also found in the VACD/IE group at 71% v. 61% with VACD alone.
  • VACD/IE also improved LC but did not improve outcomes in patients with mets at diagnosis
EICESS-92 Study
  • Comparison of cyclophosphamide v. ifosfamide and examines benefit of etoposide in high risk patients
  • Standard risk (small tumors) randomized to vincristine, dactinomycin, isfosfamide, doxorubicin followed by same or VACA (vincr. dactino, cyclophos, doxorubicin.
  • High Risk: assigned to VAIA or VAIA plus etoposide
  • Standard Risk: comparable outcomes at 74% EFS3
  • Highrisk EFS were 52% v. 47% favoring EVAIA (etoposide addition) but not statistically significant
  • Conclusion: cyclophosphamide has same efficacity as isfosphamide in standard risk patients
Euro-Ewing 99 Study
  • Designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with VIDE followed by local surgery and/or radiation therapy, and high dose therapy followed by stem cell transplant
  • 281 patients with Ewings with disseminated disease and median follow up of 3.8 years
  • EFS and OS were 27% and 34% at 3 years
  • EFS was 57% for patients with complete response and 25% for those with partial response.
  • Signficant relative risk factors: age, tumor volume, extent of mets,
  • Outcome of patients with HDT/SCT was not performed because of bias in the non-transplant group
    • 82% of patients without HDT/SCT died at median of 1 year